General Definition of Survivor: a person who survives, especially a person remaining alive after an event in which others have died.
Medical Definition of Survivor: Cancer patient who has completed treatment.
In the realm of cancer treatment and recovery, the language we use carries tremendous weight. For many individuals diagnosed with cancer, the terms "survivor" and "warrior" come with connotations that can feel alienating or even dismissive. While these labels are intended to empower and uplift, a significant number of cancer patients and survivors express discomfort with them. Understanding this perspective can foster compassion, support, and a more nuanced dialogue around cancer, emphasizing the need for personalized language.
At the heart of the issue is the idea that these labels can inadvertently simplify or minimize the complex emotional and physical realities of living with cancer. For many patients, the journey is filled with peaks and valleys; it’s not always a straightforward battle with clear winners and losers. The term “warrior” implies a constant fight, suggesting a level of strength and resilience that might not align with how someone feels on their worst days. Cancer can be debilitating, and sometimes individuals don't feel strong enough to embody such labels. This misalignment can create pressure to perform the role of a fighter, which may not resonate with everyone's personal experience. Patients try everything to hang on to this precious world, and to say they "Failed Treatment" implies insufficient effort. The actual truth is that the treatment "Failed" the patient not the other way round.
Additionally, labels like "warrior" may inadvertently marginalize those who do not have the same physical strength or resources. Cancer’s impact is not uniform; it varies based on numerous factors, including the type of cancer, treatment response, and individual characteristics. When society lauds the “warrior” mentality, it can alienate those who experience their diagnosis differently. This disconnect emphasizes the need for a more inclusive approach to discussing cancer.
Moreover, the label "survivor" can be an emotional minefield. Some who have completed treatment might still grapple with the lasting effects of the disease and its treatments, experiencing side effects that linger long after the cancer is gone. These ongoing challenges can create a rift between how they view themselves and how others perceive them. Many struggle with recurrent fears, psychological impacts, and potential late effects that complicate their relationship with the idea of being a "survivor." For me, like many others, I refer to myself as "NED" No Evidence of Disease. Declaring oneself a "survivor" seems to tempt fate or the cancer to resurface.
Incorrectly using the term "survivor" is incredibly concerning to stage 4 patients who will be on treatment for the rest of their lives. For them, they will never be out of treatment and feel this label is not reflective of their disease. Sadly, many cancers are de novo which means they have already spread and are metastatic when discovered. Since most treatments are only effective for two years before the cancer mutates, these patients are extremely dependent on research and the most toxic treatments. For them, it is a delicate balance between keep their disease stable while maintaining an acceptable quality of life.
Another critical aspect to consider is the emotional burden these labels can impose. Constantly being labeled as a "survivor" can create an expectation to feel grateful or positive, which isn’t always possible. Patients may struggle with feelings of loss, anger, or fear—emotions that sit outside the traditional narrative of victory over adversity. Labels that evoke a binary of winning or losing can lead to guilt for those grappling with these emotional complexities.
How then can we move forward in discussing cancer? It begins with a shift in language. Rather than assigning labels that may not encompass the breadth of experience, we should focus on promoting individual narratives. Encourage patients to share their stories without the pressure of fitting them into predefined molds. Language is powerful; using terms like “person living with cancer” respects an individual's journey while leaving space for differing experiences.
In conclusion, fostering sensitivity around the language used for cancer patients is essential. Understanding the reasons behind the discomfort with labels like “survivor” and “warrior” can lead to a more inclusive dialogue around cancer. It allows for broader acceptance of the numerous paths people take on their journey through this complex illness. By engaging in meaningful conversations and listening to the voices of those directly impacted, we can create a more compassionate environment that honors every unique experience with cancer and respects their emotional well-being!
Comments